If you remember, on May 13th this year, The Star reported HERE that :
Mohd Saiful, 25, admitted that he did not take his bath after he was allegedly sodomised by Anwar on June 26, 2008.
Questioned by Anwar’s lead counsel Karpal Singh, he said he had a complete bath in the morning of June 26 and merely “rinsed” (bilas) after the alleged sodomy.
He added that he did not take a bath and did not wash his anus after the allegedly incident as he wanted to keep the evidence intact.
On why did not lodge a police report after the alleged incident, he said he wanted to seek advice from several people before doing so.
“I want to get advice as it involved my dignity,” said Mohd Saiful, who is the first prosecution witness in the high profile sodomy trial Thursday.
Today, Malaysiakini reported HERE that:
10.35am: Dr Siew relates that Dr Mohd Razali took samples on cotton swab on the high and lower rectal of Saiful's anus. He says Dr Razali also took samples from peri-anal.
According to the witness, his colleague Dr Khairul Nizam also took blood samples from Saiful and used cotton swabs to take samples from Saiful's nipple.
10.39am: All the samples were sealed in a plastic container and signed by Saiful and the three doctors.
.....
11.27am: Dr Khairul Nizam said he conducted a head-to-toe physical examination on Saiful.
The witness said he started from the head down to the toes in his examination.
He noticed old scars on the victim's back and measured them.
11.32am: Dr Khairul Nizam also said that he took saliva sample from left and right nipple, areola, seminal sample from mouth and blood sample.
So more than two days after the last sodomy episode, we know that he did not 'berak' and now with the revelation that saliva samples were taken from his nipples, if INDEED there was saliva there, does it mean he also DID NOT BATHE or does it mean the saliva was so powerful that it can withstand soap and water in a bath?
And does it mean the saliva remnant on the nipple was not compromised by perspiration and other substances? By then, would it not mean that after a lapse of time of more than two days, would the sample be valid?
Why take samples from nipples? Surely Saiful would be able to ward off any attempts from anyone to lick that part of his anatomy if he disapproved of such an act! All it takes would be to punch the perpetrator on the nose or to bang the perpetrator's head with his fist!!!
If there was indeed saliva there for reasons unknown to us, he told the truth in May 2010 when he said he did not take a bath and did not wash his anus after the allegedly incident as he wanted to keep the evidence intact.
How can anyone stomach NOT BATHING OR PASSING MOTION for TWO DAYS or more???
The Malaysian Insider also reported HERE that a forensic pathologist said today that there was evidence of anal penetration on the lead witness in the sodomy trial of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim even though there was no clinical findings to support the conclusion.
Hospital Kuala Lumpur pathologist Dr Siew Sheue Feng told the High Court here that the lack of resistance through the use of lubricants could be the reason why there was no clinical finding of anal penetration on Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.
The mystery deepens!!!
Hmmm very strange facts or fancy? What do you think?
Anonymous He must have been one cool victim, having the presence of mind to preserve evidence for 2 days!!!!!
Whether rinsing or taking a shower, what is our natural instinct? I suppose most hands would cleanse the face, and ever so naturally move to our private parts then the armpits. Is he so different? Even rinsing, water would have seeped through the cleavage of the buttocks, and he do have to dry it somehow.
But then, why? Its Bolehlalnd, where the impossible is made possible.